Posted by: minnow | July 25, 2016

Out the Window

Confession: I have become a humorless person.  I cannot even laugh at Stephen Colbert or Jon Stewart anymore.  The other day, I saw a post that an island in Ireland will accept American immigrants if the GOP candidate wins.  I wonder how much a plane ticket costs? I wonder if Irishturk has an airport?  Honestly, I am at a loss.  The world seems to have gone mad.  Reason, fact, logic, humanity–have all gone out the window.  And, I am seriously afraid for our country.

My son’s response to my most recent posts exposes my dilemma, “But Mom, you sound like you support Clinton just because she’s not Trump.  That’s not going to win her votes.  It certainly isn’t going to convince anyone who plans to vote for Trump to jump ship.”  He’s correct of course.  My enthusiasm for Hillary’s election wouldn’t register on a Richter scale. I am indeed voting for Hillary because she is not Trump.  But I can say this without any hesitation or regret–SO SHOULD YOU!  If you have no other reason “She’s not Trump!” is reason enough.

I was an enthusiastic Sanders supporter.  I not only agreed with his policies I respected him as a person.  BUT Sanders is not running.  Sanders endorsed Clinton.  Sanders and Warren, both people who are on the progressive end of politics, are campaigning as hard as they can for Clinton because they know she is the only candidate, as weak as she may be, who has a chance of defeating Trump.  They know, as a Democrat, to vote for a third party candidate is courting disaster.

I admit I did not watch all of the GOP convention.  In fact I watched very little of it.  I tried.  But, I couldn’t make myself listen to the distortions, the hate, the claims to care about American values while pitting one group against another, and open threats to undo the progress made by the EPA, the Consumers Protection Bureau and equal rights.  If what the GOP adopted in its platform are American principles I no longer embrace what America does.  If their platform reflects Christian principles I can no longer recognize Christianity. Jon Stewart is correct–the GOP does not have a corner on the values market.

This is absolutely not the election to stay home.  This is not the time to stay silent.  I understand why people are angry because I am angry.  Washington has made a habit of ignoring the will of the people.  Our politicians have bowed to the will of big banks, Wall Street executives, and monied interests for far too long. But electing one of the very people who has made a career of throwing his monetary weight around Washington is not the way to solve the problem of getting rid of monied interests in Washington.

I don’t normally believe in using scare tactics in order to make a point.  But if the truth about Donald Trump doesn’t scare people then they better not be afraid of terrorist threats, a weak economy, global warming, the national debt, their jobs moving over seas, or their civil liberties being taken away.  Should Trump’s bluster toward China cause China to call in its debt the United States could go bankrupt which means that every single one of us would have to pay and pay some more just to stay afloat.  If Trump manages to offend all our trade allies by refusing to make mutually beneficial trade deals and insisting the deals he makes will only benefit us, our allies will simply take their goods else where.  And guess what?–The United States is not self-sustaining.  We could not even completely feed ourselves, forget about all the oil we still import.

I know Trump promises to take care of us.  He’ll make “them” do what he says. He’ll keep our enemies out and destroy ISIS.  But the United States is not a business.  The US president isn’t the “boss” of the world.  He can’t just fire other countries, refuse to pay what he owes, or file bankruptcy and let someone else suffer the consequences the way he did in business.  Sovereign nations don’t work the same way private business do.  He cannot simply invade another country without serious repercussions.

I may have lost my sense of humor but it is better to stop laughing than to stop thinking.  The world is watching.  It is beginning to think America has lost its collective mind.  We can, and must, continue to fight to get big monied interests out of Washington.  But, we can do that best by changing the face of Congress.  We cannot afford to minimize the threat of a Donal Trump presidency.  We cannot afford to lose the progress we have made in the last eight years with regard to equal rights, the environment, and international relations.  Plug your nose if you must, but please don’t put the United States at risk by allowing Trump to be elected.


Posted by: minnow | July 18, 2016

Two Parties, Two Candidates, One Choice

I’ve said a lot of negative things about Hillary Clinton.  I still believe Sanders would make a better candidate and a better president.  I would vote for him if he ran as an independent because I believe he is a man of good character. I agree with his policies. He’s got name recognition. AND I believe he could win.  But, Bernie Sanders is no longer running.  And, he will not run as a third party candidate.  He has endorsed Hillary Clinton as the only viable alternative to Trump and he will work for HER election.
Many Sanders supporters are looking at sitting this election out, writing his name in, or voting for a third party candidate. They argue that Clinton is establishment politics and in the pocket of Wall Street.  They claim character is paramount and they just “can’t in good conscious” vote for Hillary.  “She’s lied”.  “She’s cheated”. “She’s…” all the rest of the rightwing mantra.  The trouble with all this chatter is, when asked for proof they simply reply, “Well it’s evident. Look for yourself.”  And so…I have.
The truth-o-meter at Politifact indicates Hillary Clinton has been the most accurate, truthful political voice on the campaign trail. Her true, mostly true, and half true meter registered 2 percentage points above Sanders and 48 percentage points above Trump.  When I dug a little deeper and took a look at voting records I found Clinton’s record  in the Senate was as progressive as Sander’s.  And while it doesn’t account for a total difference in attitude and behavior, simply being a woman does separate her some from the Washington establishment. I am still frustrated with and disappointed by Clinton’s connections to Wall Street. Certainly, when the choice was between Sanders and her, Hillary’s Wall Street associations were a deciding factor.  Now, however, we are no longer deciding between Clinton and Sanders.  They are, for all intent and purposes on the same side.  And, we must look at the realities of this coming election.
Just for the sake of argument, let’s consider the third party option.  At this moment, the only semi viable third party candidate is Jill Stein, but she is still only on the ballot in 23 states. That is less than half.  In other words, it would be just as difficult–more difficult in fact–for people to vote for Stein than it was for people to vote for Sanders.  But let’s pretend some third party candidate is on the ballot in all 50 states. The fact remains, even if every one of us who voted for Bernie Sanders (or someone else based on the character issue) somehow got on the same page and we ALL voted for the same third party candidate, Donald Trump would be our next president.  And, our candidate would come in a distant third behind Hillary, and behind Trump.
Those of you who are seriously considering a protest vote, or worse not voting at all, PLEASE take a long, hard look at what your action would mean.  Politics in its current state stinks.  We desperately need reform which is why staying home makes no sense.  At the very least, we need to rid the system of those Senators and Representatives who have been collecting a paycheck but refusing to do their jobs.  But, fixing the broken system will take all hands on deck, which means YOU need to show up at the polls.
Based on the facts–her voting record and her policy statements–Hillary Clinton will for the most part be a status quo president.  She will extend the kinds of policies President Obama has held, some of which have favored Wall Street and some of which have favored reform.  And, she will remain an active participant in world affairs.  Clinton has been, by far, the most scrutinized, investigated, and vetted politician in recent history.  Yet she has not once been indicted, charged, or sanctioned.
I agree with those who say character is paramount.  In fact in this election, personal integrity matters more to me than where the candidates stand on any single issue or every issue combined.  And, while voting for a third party candidate might make me feel better about not compromising my own principles for the sake of politics, too much is at stake for me to cast a feel good vote. No matter how much we might want the situation to be different, Americans are stuck with two viable choices for president–Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton.
If you are sincerely concerned about Hillary Clinton’s integrity you should be terrified by Donald Trump‘s.  Including four bankruptcies, multiple suits over the dysfunctional Trump University, charges by the federal government for rental discrimination in the 70’s, tenant intimidations in the 80’s and conspiracy to avoid paying union pensions and welfare contributions for undocumented workers when the Trump Towers were built, Donald has spent millions in legal battles. Most often he decided to pay settlements in order to avoid having to admit guilt.  Outside of his business dealings, Trump regularly makes ugly racist and sexist remarks.  He has indicated that once he becomes president he plans to not only break international laws but also blatantly ignores our constitution and even order the military to commit war crimes, clearly displaying an attitude that he is above the law and plans to bully everyone who gets in his way.  By comparison, Hillary Clinton is guilty of only one thing for which we have proof–being a political fighter.
So, by all means vote your conscious. But please, please, make sure your conscience counts ALL the costs.
Posted by: minnow | July 15, 2016

Perception Problem

Hillary supports keep telling those of us who are considerably more reluctant to jump on her bandwagon that Clinton simply has a perception problem.  If people really knew her…if the media (and especially FOX News) would just give her a fair shake…if we quit drinking the GOP Kool-aid…then we’d see how genuine, relatable, trustworthy, intelligent, capable,…she is.  The trouble with this argument is, the more we hear it the less inclined we are to believe it.  I know, that’s not fair but that’s the way the cookie crumbles so deal with it.

Clinton needs to do more than draw a beer if she wants the Tech Gens (AKA voters age 18-40) to care about her election.  And, unless she cares about Tech Gen voters she will lose the election.  Time is running out.  The endorsements from Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders will not be enough to sway 18 to 40 year olds to vote for Clinton, especially when doing so feels like compromising one’s principles.  Frankly, Tech Gen voters give little weight to endorsements, ad campaigns, a deep resume, or big money.  In fact, those elements tend to contribute to the negative impression and make her less relatable.  Clinton, more than Trump, must change her base message if she plans to attract more that the party base come election day.

The biggest negative Clinton carries at the moment is the real or perceived attitude that she’s “owed” the election. Some thinks she has the attitude because she stood by her husband when he was a cad. Others think she has it because the DNC promised her the presidency so long as she raised money for them which she most assuredly has done. Still others think she’s counting on Wall Street to buy it for her.  Very few believe she’s earned it the old fashioned way–through hard work. Ironically, if she continues to harp on the part of her message which focuses on what SHE has done or what SHE is going to do, even fewer voters are going to give a damn–deciding instead that SHE doesn’t need their help.

To win come fall, Hillary Clinton must cut the word “I” out of her vocabulary, unless it’s followed by “am sorry” or “am saddened by”.  She needs to remind the electorate–just like Sanders did, that we are in this together, that accomplishing our goals will take every single one of us, that Government of the People means the people MUST get involved.  She can’t continue to allow the perception to be perpetuated that SHE is a one-person show.  Every single chance she get she needs to surround herself with family–not necessary her family but American families–the general public, not other politicians, or the wealthy elite.  I’m not saying put her in a kitchen to bake cookies. But, I am saying maybe she should be seen reading a children’s book to some kindergartners.  Maybe she needs to visit a VA hospital, buy a plum at a a farmer’s market, or check out an internet cafe.  Let her stand at a podium looking presidential during the debates but in the meantime, she ought to be seen at a town meeting that’s held in a school gym rather than some ritzy hotel.  The walls Hillary must endorse are the ones that are easily washed away; she should let her hair get a little wind blown, kick off her shoes, role up her pants, take a walk in the gulf sand and join some children building a castle, children whose futures she wants to protect.

Damn right Clinton has a perception problem. But, if she’s going to overcome it, we need more than words of assurance that it shouldn’t exist.  If we are going to connect with Hillary Clinton, if she is going to successfully win our votes, we have to believe she wants, sincerely wants, to connect with us.  We have to believe she wants our input, not simply our vote.  We need to see her reaching out, tuning in, and rolling up her sleeves to join the battles WE have already been fighting.  If Clinton is going to win this election, the talking points and talking heads can’t be focused on Hillary.  Her language, her demeanor, her message must shift the focus away from herself and onto hard working, middle class Americans. In order to unify voters Clinton must be about doing–together–what is right for America.  If this is not who Hillary is, or who she is willing or able to become, she will lose the election.


Posted by: minnow | July 11, 2016

Black and Blue

I recently read a passionate and heart felt post from Jay Stalien that a FB friend reposted. While lengthy it shared his unique experience as an African-American and a police officer.  I believe we can all learn a lot from what he has to say so please check out his message for yourself. In this post, I do not intend to deny or belittle Stalien’s experience in any way.  Yet having said that, I found a few of his statements troubling and would like to discuss them further.

Stalin wrote, “Black Lives do not matter to most black people. Only the lives that make the national news matter to them.” He went on to quote statistics about Black on Black crime, comparing them to the statistics of officer related shootings.  Truly, Black on Black homicides number in the thousands every year.  BUT, our country contains millions of African-Americans. The vast majority of whom are solid citizens who care deeply about the their families, our communities, and this nation. We must take care that we don’t use the dramatically large numbers of one situation (Black on Black crime) to distract us from the reality of the other (Blue on Black crime).  We must also guard against the ease with which we vilify entire groups by failing to make necessary distinctions between the parts and the whole.

Another troubling phrase used by Stalien in his post was “…cops who were assassinated in Dallas [were] protecting the very people that hated them the most. ” This statement implies that the peaceful Black Lives Matter protesters who marched in Dallas hated the police. It further implied they condoned the actions of a lone gunman who brutally murdered five officers and injured seven others, including two civilians.  This implication could not be further from the truth.  Protesting injustice is NOT the same as hating a group of people. As concerned citizens we do not need to choose between supporting good police officers and insisting people of color receive justice.  To think otherwise is divisive and short-sighted.

The last statement I wish to address, “I realized the African American community refuses to look within to solve its major issues, and instead makes excuses and looks outside for solutions.” may apply to some in the African-American community however, blanket statements such as this are not helpful. They discount the hundreds of thousands of people who work tirelessly to find solutions to the problems facing African-Americans. Pointing out that one of the problems people of color face in America is systemic racism is not the same as making excuses. Instead, it draws attention to the fact that a disproportionate number of people of color are stopped by police daily, a disproportionate number of people of color are arrested for, convicted of, and serve longer sentences for the same crimes committed by Whites, and a disproportionate number of people of color suffer from unemployment, a lack of educational opportunities, and serious to severe poverty. We can point to the exceptions to the rule–those few who have overcome serious obstacles–and pretend they prove that a person who is willing to work will automatically succeed, or we can begin to understand the real tolls inequality, racism, and unacknowledged privilege take. Our actions, more than our words, show whether or not we believe these types of prejudice are unacceptable.

Stalin wants us to look at the serious problem of Black on Black crime.  And well we should. According to crime statistics collected by the FBI, in 2013 Black Americans took the lives of 2245 other Black Americans.  And, over 90 percent of the homicides in the Black community were committed by other Blacks. These are horrifying statistics.  (For comparison purposes over 80 percent of the homicides in the White community were committed by other Whites).

As serious as these numbers are, criticizing protesters from the Black Lives Matter group because they focus on a different type of violence is unfair, especially since the issue which causes them concern is every bit as serious and may impact how well we are able to address Black on Black crime.  In January of 2015 The Washington Post began tracking fatal shootings by the police. In their  article, “Aren’t more white people than black people killed by police? Yes, but no.”, the Post revealed some startling findings. In just over a year and a half, 1502 people have been shot and killed by on-duty officers.  732 were white and 381 were black. If we simply compare raw numbers more than twice as many Whites were killed as Blacks.  The problem is while whites make up approximately 62 percent of the population, Blacks only make up 13 percent.  At the same time, Whites account for under 50 percent of the police related fatalities and Blacks account for 24 percent, making Blacks 2.5 times more likely to be killed by police than Whites.  To clarify this picture just a little bit more, according to the same article, “Of all of the unarmed people shot and killed by police in 2015, 40 percent of them were black men, even though black men make up just 6 percent of the nation’s population.”  Who can blame a Black person in America for distrusting the police when they are more than twice as likely as Whites to be killed by a police officer, even when unarmed?  And how likely would you be to call for help from the very group you distrust?

Yes, absolutely the vast majority of police officers do their jobs with integrity.  They deserve our respect and our support.  Likewise, and this fact is also too easily forgotten–the vast majority of Black people simply want to go about their business in peace.  They want to go home at night and feel safe.  They want to send their children out into the world and not worry.  They want to work with, not fear, the police. With authority comes great responsibility.  Every person who promises to protect and to serve takes on both.  Let us both hold them accountable and hold them in high esteem.


Posted by: minnow | June 21, 2016

It’s Been Over a Week

To be honest, I have often wanted to respond to offers of prayer–don’t bother.  But never more than at times like this.

Sunday morning (6/12), at approximately 2AM, a gunman went into a night club in Orlando, FL and began to murdered its patrons.  By 6AM the shooting stopped.  As a result, 50 people are dead. Dozens more are wounded. The violence profoundly impacted a community, cause hundreds of families and friends to mourn the loss of loved ones, and once again stunned a nation.  As the FBI and local authorities investigate we will find out more details about the shooter’s life, mental state, and beliefs than we care to know.  We will endure the continuous updates and repeated images of angry protesters, grieving sympathizers, and politicians trying to make a point, AKA score from the tragedy.

And, this vile act is a tragedy.  It reveals numerous opportunities where America has neglected to act rightly, where we have fail to protect our people, where our fear and ignorance have ruled the day over our compassion and intellect.  The fact we can refer to these tragedies in the plural, and they have their own category–mass shootings–boggles the mind.  For me, two issues dominate my FB page, news feed, and thinking in the wake of this heinous crime.  And no, I am not talking about the need for tougher immigration laws, escalating the conflict in the Middle East, shoving the LGBT community back into the closet, or finding Jesus. I am talking about the need for stronger gun control, and the role of religious hate.

The shooter in Orlando obtained his semi-automatic assault rifle legally.  He was known for violent out bursts and racist, homophobic, and sexist comments.  He was even investigated by the FBI and on a watch list.  Yet, he obtained his handgun legally. He had mental health issues.  He had known sympathies for extremist hate groups.  He was an American citizen.  And, he obtained his weapons legally.

Just so we’re perfectly clear: I personally don’t care about your gun rights!  When you refuse to come to the table to discuss reasonable laws regarding gun use and ownership your “rights” don’t deserve to be considered.  When you refuse to take responsibility for putting non-sport weapons in the hands of unstable people your “rights” don’t get a vote.  My rights and my children’s rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness trump your right to carry a gun that could kill multiple people in seconds.

And guess what–most Americans favor stricter gun regulations.  79 percent of Americans support background checks, 80 percent support preventing the mentally ill from buying weapons, and 61 % are neutral or would favor a ban–A BAN–on semi automatic weapons.  Yet Congress continues to stall and postpose any attempt to pass more stringent legislation regarding guns.  Why?  Well, between 2000 and 2012 the gun lobby poured $81 million dollars into House, Senate, and presidential races.

Our constitution does not give you or me unfettered freedom to do whatever we want whenever we want to whomever we want!  In fact, our Constitution quite frequently limits our freedom.  It regulates government but it also regulates individuals. The 2nd Amendment everyone is so anxious to defend, couples our right as an individual to bear arms with the need to maintain a well regulated militia.  And what does the phrase “well regulated” refer to?  It refers to the training a body of volunteer soldiers is expected to undergo.  Thus our freedom is paired with a responsibility, one we have severely neglected. So, if you stand with those who are unwilling to pass laws limiting  the sale and use of weapons–especially weapons of mass destructions–then in light of the most recent gun related tragedy in Orlando, take your oh so precious prayers and leave me and mine alone! Period.  prayer without feet is simply not good enough.

Now, while I am adamant on my stance about what the 2nd Amendment actually protects and our need for stricter gun laws the issue raised by the Orlando shooting which takes precedence for me today is the hate stirred up and passed off as righteousness by religion.  And, I’m not really talking about Islamic extremists; I’m talking abut Christian extremists because it’s their rhetoric which has begun to hijack my religion.  In the aftermath of the Orlando massacre, most Christian voices fell into two categories: vile hate mongers spewing all sorts of false accusations against Muslims and screaming condemnation of the LGBT community, and the much smaller group of people like Hugh Hollowell.

I refuse to give the hate rhetoric any more air time so you will find no links from me.  But I do want those people who have felt the sting from those voices to know this–they do not represent the Christian God of love.  They do not model the example of Christ we find in the Gospels.  Their words and actions come out of their own twisted fear-filled hearts.  They have no business claiming to speak for God.  While we need to figure out how to love them as well, we want you to know right now–there are gay and straight Christians alike who love you, who will support you in whatever ways we can, and who stand with you both in your anger and in your grief.  Please, forgive us for not doing more, sooner.

One last group of people need to be mentioned: the silent majority. In his post, Hollowell offers six guidelines to Christians who do not want to be counted among the hate mongers.  I recommend you read this post and apply his wisdom to your life.  Remaining on the sidelines with our mouths shut should no longer be an option.  Being ugly and spreading fear never was.  You do not need to know someone from the LGBT community or even agree with them on any topic in order to have a voice about the immorality of hate.  The time has come to speak out. Period.


Posted by: minnow | June 11, 2016

To Clinton Supporters Everywhere

Change the dialogue or quit talking.

As a woman, I resent the implication that any woman who wants to be successful or or wants their daughters to be successful should hold Hillary Clinton up as a roll model. I am also frustrated by how often I am told I “hate” Hillary simply because I dare to criticize her. I do not HATE this woman. I DISAGREE WITH HER. I truly dislike her husband–as a person (from what has been made public) and as a president. I think he was bad for middle class America and bad for women. I dislike Hillary because I think she will also be a bad president for middle class America and for women particularly because she seems to think her husband did no wrong. I worry that she is too hawkish and I believe she is too invested with big money and won’t be able to extract herself even if she wants to. I am ANGRY, that the rigged system, she embraces, has made her the nominee and even angrier that the GOP bring us Trump because I truly want to vote for someone who I can believe will do what is best for America.

I don’t want Hillary Clinton to be the first woman I vote for as a presidential candidate, and the first woman elected to be president merely because the other guy is scarier. And trust me AT THIS POINT IN TIME THAT IS THE ONLY REASON WHY she will be elected, if indeed she is. Today is a sad day for women and an even sadder day for America.

I wish Hillary supporters would start working as hard to show us how HER POSITIONS ON THE ISSUES are good for America’s middleclass and for women as they do trying to tell people like me that Hillary doesn’t deserve to be “hated”. I agree, she doesn’t deserve to be hated but she doesn’t deserve to be supported just because she’s a woman. THAT is the ultimate gender bias. And she doesn’t deserve to be supported just because she is not as evil as Trump.  THAT is the ultimate in fear-mongering.  Hillary Clinton is no victim. She and her supporters need to stop whining about how thoroughly she’s been vetted, how unfairly she’s been treated by the press, and how easily misled Sanders supporters have been. Start changing the dialogue.  Start talking about issues that matter to the people you want to support her.  Start showing the country that Hillary Rodham Clinton is worthy of the votes she garnered from the general population and not just the DNC elite and Wall Street. 

If Clinton wants my support beyond the November election, she’s got her work cut out for her.  For now she has my less than enthusiastic vote.  But, I truly hope that is NOT enough for her.  I hope once she becomes the president we find out what Clinton stands for and not simply what is politically expedient.  I hope we see what she is willing to fight for because it is the best possible option for all the people and not just the few at the top.  I hope, all the people in all the stories she tells, about overcoming adversity and struggling to overcome, will be able to be proud their stories were illustrations to her talking points.  I want to be proud that she is the first woman president but so far I am just holding my nose.


Posted by: minnow | May 7, 2016

“They” Don’t Get It

Fear is a powerful motivator.  So my question is–what do you fear more–Donald Trump, moneyed interests continuing to tighten their grip on American politics, or a progressive socio-economic agenda?  The 1% fear the latter which should cause the rest of us to examine our options carefully.

Personally, I’m sick and tired of the pro-Clinton media making every Sanders win sound like it lines up in the loss column.  AKA shame on the Chicago Tribune article found here.  I’m tired of the Clinton campaign throwing Sanders supporters bread crumbs to try to entice us to follower her into the political forest of half steps toward progress.  AKA her suddenly vocal whining for campaign finance reform found here that makes it sound like it was her idea to start the conversation.  And, I’m tired of the opposition slapping Sanders with “comrade” cracks and swastikas as if caring about the social fabric of our nation, wanting to give the middle class a break, and thinking we have an obligation to the nation’s poor are somehow un-American positions. Such patronizing rhetoric is proof positive that Clinton, her supporters, and the GOP simply don’t get it.

“But wouldn’t you prefer Clinton to Trump?” I’m constantly asked. “Yes,” I answer, “if those are my only options.  But, just barely.  And, those are NOT my only options.”  Voting for Clinton at best is voting for four more years of deadlock.  Voting for Clinton is also voting to give the Republicans four years to regroup while they continue to sling mud at progressive ideas.  But more importantly, voting for Clinton feels like we’re throwing the movement to take back our political process under the bus.  It is telling hundreds of thousands–millions–of people to wait because it is just too risky right now, too much is at stake. We can’t afford to…

TO WHAT?  Seriously, what can’t we afford to allow?  What is at stake now that won’t be equally precarious the next election cycle and the next and the next.  These arguments are textbook fear tactics.  Every election since I began voting (almost 40 years ago) has been described as pivotal.  But have they been?  Realistically, much more may be at stake if we don’t use the momentum Bernie Sanders campaign has given us to solidify our message  of political reform.  Revolutions take work and sacrifice.  Clinton can never be part of the revolution because her thinking, how she functions as a politician, is part of the problem.  Sanders’ supporters aren’t obligated to elect Hillary Clinton.  The very reason they support Sanders is because he stands against many of the things she stands for, or at the very least is using to get elected.

If Clinton supporters can’t come up with enough party faithfuls to defeat Trump then they deserve him.  After all, the party faithfuls are the ones who put Hillary on the ticket. If she loses–and I personally believe the likelihood is high that she will–they have only themselves to blame.  I have said ever since her  nomination was deemed inevitable that Democrats underestimated how much she is reviled by the GOP.  Her haters will come out in mass and vote for anyone, including Trump, in order to vote against Hillary Clinton.

So, if Bernie Sanders were to decide to run as a third party candidate I will do everything in my power to get his name on the ballot in my state! Because, Americans deserve the opportunity to vote FOR someone we can respect, someone we can trust to work for the general good.  It should not be enough to vote AGAINST the other guy.  When you vote for the lesser of two evils you still accept evil as an option.  Far too many people, in far too many elections, have chosen to stay home rather than engage in that kind of political battle.  The last year voter turn out was above 60% was in 1968.  I was 10.  Such apathy, such hopelessness, saddens me.

The  Sanders’ campaign and the movement he currently leads has controlled the conversation of this election cycle–precisely because those are the conversation we should be having. We feel passionately about what Sanders stands for, almost as passionately as he does.  Giving us lip service about incremental raises in minimum wage, tweaking Obamacare, and taking on Wall Street, or telling us you’re going to work hard to bring the youth vote on board smacks of politics as usual. The media’s irresponsible obsession with the circus of the Republican campaign is bad enough. But add to it Clinton’s latest anti-Trump ad that assaults our intelligence with a 30 second sound byte of more GOP whining and our deepest suspicions are confirmed: without Sanders in it, we won’t be focused on the issues because Trump wouldn’t know an issue if it made a nest in his hair, and Clinton is not about the issues; she is about getting elected. Period.

So yes, Sanders’ supporters want him to take his message all the way to the convention.  We deserve to be heard, not because we’re more important than anyone else, but because our concerns are shared by most other Americans. We want this election to focus on campaign finance reform, and putting an end to welfare for the rich, and making sure working 40 hours a week means you can pay your rent, buy food for your family, and afford healthcare.  We want to spend more money educating Americans than incarcerating them.  And, we want to work toward sustainable energy sources and becoming better stewards of the planet.

Most Americans, not just those who support Sanders, have had enough of politics as usual.  So, stop insulting us by insulting each other. Stop playing to our fears and insecurities and start helping us to over come them.  Stop pretending you have so much more to offer us than the other guy, when so far that sound byte is all you’ve had to offer.  You think you deserve our vote?  Then start to earn it. Period.


Posted by: minnow | April 30, 2016

Inevitable Is Old Politics

The more people warn that, as a Sanders supporter, I must eventually jump off this wagon and vote for Hillary because if I don’t do the politically correct thing Trump will win, the less I want to do it.  I’m exceedingly frustrated by her “inevitability” as the Democrats nominee.  I am tired of people suggesting that the only reason I don’t already support Hillary is because I have been unduly influenced by the lies about her from the right.  If this election has show me anything it’s shown that the delegate system, especially for the Democrats, is undemocratic.  It works against the will of the people rather than for it.  On the Republican side winner take all states make close races seem like landslides.  Yet, for the Democrats super delegates cast a shadow nearly impossible to out run and “closed primaries” disallow thoughtful, independent-minded voters because they aren’t “registered” democrats.  We say that one person’s vote matters, but…Is that actually true?

The latest headlines have Hillary trying to unite the party by urging Sanders supporters to get behind her.  I just might have to be the one to break it to you, Mrs. Clinton, but you need to show us how you actually intend to represent us with more than the threat of Trump, or we, quite frankly, might just ignore you.  More and more Sanders supports look at the differences between Clinton and Trump, and other than his crude expression, don’t see much.  Both change their tune depending on their audience or which way the wind is blowing.  Both are hawkish with regard to foreign policy.  Neither is interested in changing much on Wall Street.  And both have actually supported or befriended one another over the years–personally and politically.

If you want our vote, Secretary Clinton–you will need to earn it.  Quit telling our candidate to drop out and get in line behind you.  Quit telling us HE’S dividing the party when the truth is the democrats divided their party from the electorate when they decide to close their primaries.  Quit patting us on the head by suggesting you are simply talking about taking reachable steps to the same goals when the truth is you have NO INTENTION of taking on campaign finance reform, the pharmaceutical industry, or our broken penal system.  You’re not about to undo the trade agreements you helped to put in place.  Wall Street is your friend and the problems with education are simply too big to take on.  That Trump is an embarrassment but you’re not, isn’t a good enough reason to vote for you, Madam Secretary. You will need to earn our votes and I’m not sure you can.

The biggest difference between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders is that Clinton wants to get elected and Sanders wants to lead a movement.  After she’s elected, Clinton wants to wield her influence, HER power.  Sanders want to get to work on reforms.  Clinton wants to manage the Middle East and the economy and whatever else is laying around, FROM THE OVAL.  Sanders wants to change how we do politics and get the middle class back on its feet.  Clinton wants people to need her help, want her support, and acquiesce to her positions because she is the most powerful woman in the world.  Sanders wants people to get off their butts and join the fight because change takes more than one person.

If Hillary Clinton is elected, (and should she get the Democratic nomination I think she will be) I will consider her presidency as successful as it could be if she picks one or two fairly liberal Supreme Court Justices and pushes their nominations through the Senate.  But honestly, I won’t be surprised if her judges end up being fairly moderate. And I will truly be surprised if we don’t end up in another war.  I can easily see the Middle East turn into an uglier and less understandable Viet Nam–endless troops, endless resources, no real progress/success, and increasing incidents of terrorism.

The biggest difference between Clinton and Trump that I can see, besides his boorishness, is that more people will be willing to go along with Clinton and her presidency is more likely to last eight years. Though I suppose, if Trump gets in he could stay around for eight as well. That scenario might all depend on how many people end up getting off their butts, rolling up their sleeves, and joining in the fight.  I for one aim to keep fighting.  Sanders deserves my support NOW and he deserves my support later.  For you see, the real difference between Clinton and Sanders is that Sanders hasn’t changed his stripes.  He’s been doing the work he’s doing in this campaign, behind the scenes for the last 40 years.


Posted by: minnow | April 28, 2016

Love Never Looks Like Hate

Recently the mom’s (of LGBT-identifying children) group I belong to via FB asked us to share our “coming out” stories.  Initially, I didn’t think I had a “coming out story”, at least not one worth telling. But later, I posted a slightly different version of the following because, while not earth shattering, we did “come out”, out from under an unhealthy mindset that let religion hijack our faith.

My son came out to us when he was 18. My husband “came out” to his men’s prayer group soon after and inadvertently “outed” our son to our church “family”.  Despite a prayer room rule that what is shared in the prayer room stays in the prayer room church leadership (who did not attend the men’s prayer group) were “notified”.  My son was told he was no longer welcome in the church youth group until he repented of being gay. (This was before he’d had any physical same-sex relationship, mind you).  Obviously my son felt betrayed.  It drove a wedge between my husband and son which, five years later, is still healing.  Since I and one older brother had already stopped attending that fellowship, I didn’t think too much about the fact that my youngest son suddenly quit going.  Had I known the full situation sooner I would like to think I would have confronted them but since I had not fully found my footing I don’t honestly now what I would have done. In this past year, I have written each of the current pastors (3).
Beyond this church fellowship, I have had no family or friend talk to me directly about my son “being gay”.  I am separated from my husband so his side of the family and I don’t talk.  And, my side of the family doesn’t ask personal questions so I don’t honestly know how most of them feel.  The few friends I have either don’t care, don’t need me to see it their way, or know I wouldn’t and don’t want to get an ear full. I freely share on Facebook so the “friends” I have via FB know as much as anyone.  Finally, I have mentioned casually to most of my students that I have a gay son. I wanted anyone who needed a safe place to know there was one–in school–especially since I live in a very conservative corner of a pretty conservative state.
Honestly, I have had it easy by my group’s standards.  I was already climbing out from under religious oppression when my son told us he is gay. By God’s grace, I was never so far under religion’s thumb that I would have considered my son to be anything but who he is. I accepted him immediately; there wasn’t anything not to accept. My son, however, was wrecked with guilt and self-loathing.  He had been under the church thumb much more intensely than I had been and I am convinced had I not “gone before him” he might easily have told us he was gay in a suicide note, afraid that like the Church we would reject him.
When religion causes a child the kind of pain it caused my child–THAT religion is evil. Our children and our world deserve better.  And the God we claim to believe in, the God we tell the world we serve, the Christ we say is our role model, deserves better as well.  I will never be convinced “God’s ways” look anything like the fearful, judgmental, character assassinations people like James Dobson, Franklin Graham, Michael Brown, and Kevin Swanson spew forth while others make excuses and repeat the mantra: “God’s ways are not our ways”.
I have told my story, my son’s story, in other posts. I do so now because once again people in the LGBT community are the targets of discrimination in the name of religion–most recently with a we-need-to-keep-our-women-and-children-safe twist. The right to discriminate laws passed by NC and elsewhere are indefensable.  And Christians, who truly believe in a God of love should be standing with their transgender brothers and sisters not against them.
Statistics do not support the claims by the religious right and their GOP puppets that women and children are at risk when transgender people are allowed to use the bathroom of their choosing. IN FACT, a well-traveled public restroom is a notoriously bad place for a would-be attacker to hang out unless he hopes to be caught. IN FACT: women and children are at greater risk of being assaulted or sexually abused in their own homes than any other single place. According to the Rape and Abuse Crisis Center, 93 % of child sexual assault victims know their assailant. 34.2 percent are family members.  IN FACT: in states where transgender individuals are free to choose which restroom to use there have been no verifiable cases of a bathroom assault by a transgender individual or person pretending to be transgender.
On the other hand, crimes against transgender people paint a dismal picture.  Transgender people are at a greater risk of assault and rape than any other single group of people.  According to the Office for Victims of Crime in Washington DC, a conservative 50% of transgender people experience sexual assault in their lifetime. This figure increases to 66% when talking about people of color.  Hate crime statistics release from the FBI indicated that such crimes perpetrated against transgender individuals tripled from 31 to 98 between 2013 and 2014.  Of the 53 transgender people murdered from 2013 to 2015, not a single case has been prosecuted.  When you consider the fact that transgender people make up only .3 % of the US population these numbers are alarming.
I have no desire to minimize the damage done or the trauma experienced from sexual assault and rape. However, laws like North Carolina’s HB2 will do more to allow such crimes than to stop them.  Harming innocent people never solves a problem. We must be willing to “out” the fear and ignorance behind these kinds of laws. For God’s sake, don’t let hate win this debate.  True love never looks like hate.
Posted by: minnow | April 6, 2016

Fuel the Revolution

Lately, the suggestion that what Bernie Sanders has championed will continue under Clinton, if she wins the nomination, is making the rounds.  I say: BOLOGNA. In fact, I think such talk is actually double-speak for, “vote for Hillary, so we don’t have to actually change.”  PLEASE, HEAR THIS CLEARLY.  And, give it some SERIOUS thought: Hillary Clinton cannot maintain what Bernie Sanders is leading.  She doesn’t. Even. Want to. 

Despite a similar voting record, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are not the same brand of Democrat. 

This article from Rolling Stone’s editor Jann Wenner suggests Clinton is the better candidate than Sanders because she knows how Washington works and her incremental plans are more practical, more realistic.  In other words they won’t upset the powers that be…oops I mean the DNC..or, er…the apple cart.  Sanders, according to this sage (?) wisdom, well…he’s just too, too pie in the sky, too unwilling to compromise, too angry. This article, also from Rolling Stone Magazine, written last year warned that we may have a different Senator Sanders problem.  Too many American just might agree with Bernie. 

Fast forward to today and the mainstream media and the Democratic machine continue to repeat the same old mantra.  Both  insist Sanders doesn’t have a chance. He shouldn’t be taken seriously. He can’t possibly beat the Democrat’s darling. America needs a woman at the helm.  (AKA: Women can not call themselves feminists unless they vote for Clinton).  He doesn’t have the Black vote. (For get that while she was working for Goldwater he was helping to organize sit-ins).  How dare he bring up who contributes to her campaign. Sanders ought to play nice. He should do the honorable thing, admit defeat, and bow out.  Look at the delegate count.

But, guess what mainstream media–America, at least young America, isn’t listening to you anymore. In fact, more and more Americans–new Democrats, young Democrats, and old(er) Democrats–think the party bosses are part of the problem NOT the solution.

This article, also from Rolling Stone, hits on a couple key differences between Sanders and Clinton.  First, Hilary is part of the machine, which may be why she understands how Washington works.  Secondly, even though she like to paint herself as the champion of Black America she has actually been on the wrong side of many racially charged issues.  This article by Michelle Alexander, Author of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness, is far from an endorsement of Bernie Sanders.  Yet, it does an excellent job discussing the relationship the Clintons have had with Black America and suggests strongly it’s a relationship that ought to be reexamined.

Up until now I have been careful not to criticize the former Secretary of State too harshly.  I have not wanted to need to eat my words should she get the nomination and I begin to urge thinking people to vote for her.  Recently, however, as her national lead has begun to shrink and the primaries move away from the South where she has had a comfortable lead (though might I remind you, in a general election most southern states go red), the Clinton campaign has shown signs of feeling threatened.

A month or so ago articles suggesting the only reason Sanders supporters prefer Bernie to Hilary is because we believe the lies the right has told, started showing up in my news feed.  These Clinton advocates insist Hilary is the most honest candidate running and therefore doesn’t deserve the bad press from the right.  And it is true, according to PolitiFACT Clinton receives more “mostly true” ratings and fewer “pants on fire” ratings than anyone else.  Sanders being her close second.  Yet, honesty, at least for me, is not simply a matter of getting more facts right in a debate.  And integrity is not only measured by staying within the law. These are important qualities, attributes I expect my leaders to hold.  But character is tempered and revealed by more than the jot and tittle of the law.

I have always been disturbed by the notion of super delegates.  And now more than ever.  They feel dishonest to me, like they undermine the purity of the individual’s vote and the notion that a single person,  without fame and without fortune, can make a difference.  So, when I read an article accusing Sanders of foul play because he dared to talk about where Clinton got some of her money (oil and coal, and Wall Street) and then I read this article from Margot Kidder discussing how the Clinton campaign bought the primaries at the Democratic Convention back in August, I saw red.  Of course, buying the primaries of 33 states, including mine, was all done legally, sort of like Trump using our current bankruptcy laws to get rich while others were left without jobs, etc…But, legal and moral are not necessarily the same thing.

I will vote for Bernie Sanders in the primary election because I believe he will push harder and fight more sincerely for the changes I believe need to take place in our country.  I trust him.  He has fought this fight his whole adult life.  But, if in the general election my preferred candidate is NOT the nominee I will still, reluctantly, vote for the Democratic candidate because the alternative is, for me, terrifying.  I indicated in my opening paragraph that the notion that Hilary Clinton could continue the movement Sanders is currently promoting is ludicrous primarily because she has no interest in doing so.  Saying so does not mean, however, that the movement itself will die.
We may face darker days before we greet the dawn.  Our struggle may end up costing us more dearly later than it will if we choose to act now.  But in the end, I believe the sun will rise.  America will find her better self.  We will decide to work and live together rather than surrender to fear and die apart.  We can.  We will.  We must.

Older Posts »



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 298 other followers